![]() “It becomes an endless series of judgment calls. So how do constructors decide what’s in and what’s out? Patrick Berry, a constructor whose puzzles have appeared in The New York Times and The New Yorker, said that he strives to keep his puzzles “apolitical,” which is difficult. “There was a lot of anger over that.”Įven Sharp, who is one of Shortz’s biggest critics, said that “Shortz changed the New York Times, radically in terms of how fun it was…turning away from being a test about arcane knowledge and toward a kind of playful, wordplay-oriented kind of puzzle.”Īlthough crossword constructors and solvers are overwhelmingly left-wing-Shortz surveyed attendees of his American Crossword Puzzle Tournament in March 2017 and found that close to 90 percent voted for Clinton-there is no consensus among editors, podcasters, and solvers on what should be included in a puzzle. But it’s also, as I did not know at the time, an offensive term for Hispanics,” he said. “It’s baseball slang for a ball that hits the batter’s head. A few years ago, Shortz included the word “beaner” in a puzzle. ![]() Shortz brought pop culture into crosswords, Taussig said. When Shortz became editor of The Times crossword in 1993, things began to change. ![]() “You’re making an assertion about what counts as ‘common knowledge.’”įor decades the people making decisions about what should be in a puzzle have been straight white men according to Taussig, who said crosswords were a “very much elite, hyper educated, white, New York City thing, where if you didn’t know chess and your classics you were screwed.” “Whether you want it or not, there’s a kind of inherent politics ,” said Michael Sharp, a SUNY-Binghamton English professor who, under the pseudonym Rex Parker, pens a blog critiquing The Times crossword and has constructed puzzles for them. On March 21, 1943, the New York Times crossword clue was “author of a bestseller.” The answer: six letters long “HITLER.” Hitler still appears in the Times crosswords, but his last name hasn’t been an answer since 1984 (clued as “history’s blackest.”) The types of clues and answers in crosswords have shifted dramatically. Questions arise: should dictators appear in crosswords? Serial killers? What about Donald Trump? Or Hitler? Are terms like “hag” okay? Puzzle debates represent a microcosm of larger cultural conflicts surrounding race, class, and gender. So you also have this responsibility to at least be aware of what it is that you’re feeding those people.” “Hundreds of thousands of people are consuming this thing on a daily basis and paying for it. “During the pandemic, the same type of reckoning that we’ve had in the rest of American society…where we’re looking at representation, we’re looking at inclusion,” said Rebecca Neipris co-host of the Crossnerds podcast. At a time when debates about language anchor political discourse and incorrect pronouns spark vicious attacks, the fact that culture wars are being played out in crossword puzzles makes sense. Sex is just one of the many contentious issues surrounding crossword puzzles. The AV Club crossword, however, has published “pegging.” While an article on pegging might run in the actual newspaper, Taussig said, in the crossword, things are kept more PG. References to “pegging,” will never show up in The Times, according to Benjamin Taussig editor of the indie American Values Club crossword (which formerly ran in The Onion), and author of The Curious History of the Crossword. “But I assure you this viewpoint is expressed with a pure heart.”Ī response from Will Shortz about the entry 2D in today's crossword puzzle. “I want your focus to be on the puzzle rather than being distracted by side issues,” Shortz said. Shortz added that if enough people are offended, he would rethink this opinion on benign uses of otherwise offensive slurs.Īlso Read: USA Today Cuts Ties With Crossword Editor in Plagiarism Scandal These are legitimate words,” Shortz said. (which we clued last April as “Proceed all right,” but which as a solid word is a slur), CHINK (which is benign in the sense as a chink in one’s armor,” etc. “This is an issue that comes up occasionally with entries like GO O.K. The original clue to 2-Down in Tuesday’s puzzle, which was written by Gary Cee, was “Pitch to the head, informally.” And Shortz defended the use of the word by explaining that in past puzzles, a “benign” meaning of the word was fair game. “It is simply not acceptable in The New York Times Crossword and we apologize for including it.” “Tuesday’s Crossword puzzle included an entry that was offensive and hurtful,” a spokesperson for the New York Times told TheWrap.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |